Skip to content
playhaus

56 - Please, Download Our Exploit

Please, Download Our Exploit

56 - Please, Download Our Exploit

⚜️ el Prof

Heart&SOL

More in this series
Want to Grow Faster?

Want to Grow Faster?

We save businesses 30% or more on average. Learn more.

Try Now

On this page

GM HEARTLAND

MONEY MONEY MONEY

You Oughta Know

Nice To Meet You, Please Download This App

GM HEARTLAND

Is Jensen Huang scooping his bags at the top and running? Is it he being pushed out? The world will likely never know. Infidelity is wrong, full stop. But the system of corrupt, public mob justice we are seemingly living under is getting too played out. 

Jensen is human first, we are all flawed people, its natural. Perfection is inorganic. But in the case of Nvidia and his work in industry, he is without a doubt a giant. And whether its more calculated a la Ze Zuck, or it's genuine, we have support for the business leaders that push opensource AI further. And NVIDIA, at one of the most foundational levels WAS pushing that forward. It seems clear that incoming leadership is unlikely to be favorable to opensource AI support.
We can only hope that more people will educate themselves on the importance of cryptography as it applies to digital identity, and data, in the surveillance economy we are on the precipe of entering.

- el Prof, Britt, Muhammed

MONEY MONEY MONEY

TOKENPRICE CHANGEPRICE
Solana ($SOL) -9.54%$81.43
Ripple ($XRP) -12.43%$1.02
ZCash ($ZTC) -25.28%$949.01
Bitcoin ($BTC) -6.63%$70,643.32

(Price changes reflect past 7 days — 11.12.26)

Looks bloody.

You Oughta Know

What a week for trust.

On Thursday, Jensen Huang left the chat, and officially resigned as CEO of Nvidia after reports of an affair with a client who, U.S. intelligence officials concluded, had been recruited by China’s top spy agency. (To be fair, China calls it a smear.) Nvidia was soon on track to lose more than $700 billion in value. And if extra-marital affairs are destroyers of trust, Huang got a second blow to his credibility after a follow-up allegation also accused Huang of an affair with Kimberly Powell, a VP at Nvidia.  

The product didn’t break. The chips work exactly as well as they did last Friday. What broke was trust in one person.

And X responded with conspiracies, with some suggesting Huang got pushed out for defending open weights against the closed-model labs. Somewhere, Fox Mulder is nodding in support of our previous mentioned regulatory capture nods. Huang was after all, one of the loudest champions for open weight models, and Nvidia is in the process of buying Hugging Face for $12.9 billion. But nobody has shown the ouster was engineered, and even Decrypt calls the claims unproven. However, once that deal closes, the company that makes the chips also owns the biggest hub for open models, and Nvidia in a post-Huang era is likely to turn us all into digital sharecroppers. 

So, what about blockchain? Crypto promised to engineer trust out of the system. A trustless infrastructure for a trustless digital world and we would all be landowners of our digital identity. But it still can’t tell you whether the record was true to begin with. Garbage in, immutable garbage out. So turns out, we didn’t actually eliminate the need for trust. 

If you know me, I love a well intentioned book recommendation, and I was recently gifted one for my birthday. It’s an oldie (1928) - Propaganda by Edward Bernays. In it Bernays argued that the few who organize information and shape public belief form “an invisible government.” He meant it as a feature of properly run society and solution to modern chaos, but I would argue it’s window dressing for manipulation and control. In the good ol’ days, you used to be able to Ask Jeeves and you’d get ten links and a decision. Now the butlers, in service of frontier model monopolies and tech oligarchs, write the answer and recommend a conclusion. The companies training the models are the new invisible government that nobody voted for. And if we learned anything from the blue tsunami last week, the people of the USA will vote (or abstain) if given the right motivation.

At playhaus, we support the right to vote (or abstain). We still want immutable records, open-weight models and rails nobody can switch off. But we recognize a ledger can’t make anyone honest, and a perfect contract can’t make an outcome fair. The goal was never to eliminate trust or decisions. It’s to build systems where trust is earned in public, spread wide enough that no single exit takes it down, or taken back when a failable human blows it. In the decentralized future we aspire to, everyone would play a part in the accountability process and the elements worth preserving would carry on.

Viva la resistance.

— Britt

Placeholder image
SPONSORED BY PLAYHAUS · playhaus
growbot

Meet growbot

Your digital growth co-pilot from playhaus. We save businesses 30% or more on average.

Try growbot

Nice To Meet You, Please Download This App

The Binance theft had us thinking back to an incident that happened recently, and the pattern of security attacks playhaus' has been experiencing since the Coinbase hack.

A few weeks ago, Connor (el Prof) was invited to be on a Coindesk podcast over LinkedIn, it looked really convincing, he's done them before. Until the email that scheduled the interview came through. It didn't match a domain (url) that'd be associated with Coindesk. 
Curious, Connor hopped on the call, where the scheduler remained off camera, and what he assumed to be an AI host joined. He was told the interview was actually going to take place in another tool, and provided a software to install to use it.
We nearly handed over everything sitting in his browser to an app that would have swept every wallet, every seed phrase, and every key on his machine. He caught it. Statistically speaking, most people don't.

Here's the part that should bother you: there was very little to catch outside of inution. Most of the tells were dead. Fortunately their playbook was limited an a google search revealed a read thread discussing the scam.

Near identitical to the social phishing responsible for the Binance exploit. SlashNext logged a 1,265% jump in malicious phishing emails in the year after ChatGPT shipped, with credential phishing up 967% and roughly 31,000 attacks going out daily. 

Volume is the boring half, though. The scary half came from a controlled study by Heiding, Schneier and Vishwanath, validated on live human subjects: fully AI-automated spear phishing hit a 54% click-through rate, dead level with emails written by expert human attackers, against 12% for the generic stuff.

Expert-grade attacks, at spam economics, produced faster than you'll finish this paragraph. The one thing that used to keep sophisticated phishing rare, a skilled human paying attention to you specifically, is no mostly gone. So what does the new playbook actually look like? Three moves, mostly.

  • The first is polymorphic text: legacy filters match signatures, known phrases, repeated templates, and an LLM simply writes a structurally unique message for every single recipient. Ten thousand emails, ten thousand different texts, one payload, nothing to blacklist. 
  • The second is conversation hijacking, which is nastier. Attackers stopped opening conversations. They take over a mailbox or a Telegram account, read the thread history, and slot themselves into an ongoing relationship with the right names, the right context, the right callbacks to last Tuesday. You're not evaluating a stranger anymore. You're answering a colleague. 
  • The third is voice. Three seconds of audio gets you roughly an 85% match per McAfee's testing, and executive voices are lying around in public on earnings calls, keynotes and, yes, podcast archives. Vishing incidents jumped 442% between the first and second half of 2024. One deepfaked video call cost the engineering firm Arup $25.6 million.

Crypto is where all of this lands hardest, because we're the vertical where a single bad click is final. 

On September 18, seven agencies across Japan, the U.S., Australia and Germany put out a joint advisory on WaterPlum — the DPRK crew the security world knows as Contagious Interview. Between December 2025 and July 2026 they infected more than 30,000 devices in over 100 countries, pulled funds or credentials from 7,000-plus wallets, and moved about $10.71 million home to Pyongyang. The lure was a job. A recruiter message, a technical interview, a coding test to download, or a “fix” for the video call that mysteriously won't connect. Separately, security researcher Taylor Monahan has tracked over $300 million stolen through fake Zoom and Teams meetings run off hijacked Telegram accounts and looped footage from real interviews — your compromised session then gets used on your friends, which is why the damage compounds across a network instead of stopping at you.

Connor got out because something about that download prompt felt off. Respect to the instinct, but instinct isn't a control, and the next one will be smoother, better timed, and speaking in a voice you recognize. Stop asking whether you'd catch it. Start asking what happens on the day you don't. Certainly there's something to be said about better security hygene and practices, but stay safe out there.

— Muhammed, el Prof


Subscribe to Heart&SOL

Weekly newsletter at the intersection of AI, cryptography, and online culture.